Light relief — Denton v TH White
By Ben Pilbrow
Although a decade separated them, both Lord Woolf’s and Lord Jackson’s reports on civil litigation procedure highlighted the need for and recommended change. The reforms that followed both reports sought to address the spiralling waste of time, money and resources in civil litigation. Both judges recommended active case management by the judiciary as the cure. Both judges called for a change of culture among civil litigation practitioners to put an end to the lax observance of court rules. An important question that the courts have struggled to answer satisfactorily since the publication of these reports and the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) is what happens when the CPR are breached. Where does one draw the line between punishing failures to observe court process and providing substantive access to justice?
In 2013, the Court of Appeal tried to provide guidance regarding the application of Rule 3.9 of the CPR (which sets out the circumstances in which the court should grant parties relief from the sanction) in Mitchell v News Group. The cases that followed Mitchell showed, however, that there was still a great deal of judicial confusion surrounding the issue.
This summer, the Court of Appeal had another stab at providing a satisfactory answer in the case of Denton v TH White. In a joint lead judgment, Lord Dyson reviewed the standards the court should apply in assessing applications for relief. He took great pains to stress that his judgment in Mitchell remained ‘substantially sound’. He asserted that it needed ‘detailed restatement’. Critics might conclude that the new test is more an overhaul than a fine-tuning…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Shepherd & Wedderburn briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Shepherd and Wedderburn
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shepherd and Wedderburn
The Technology and Construction Court recently discussed whether an adjudicator’s decision was finally binding.
The power of predictive coding – the coming together of human reasoning and advanced technology – as an interrogation tool.
Analysis from The Lawyer
With banking, personal injury and M&A all down, law firm mergers are in the bracing Scottish air