LIBOR misrepresentation claims will proceed to trial
By Nick Cross
The Court of Appeal has handed down its much anticipated judgment in Graiseley Properties Ltd and others v Barclays Bank plc, heard jointly with Deutsche Bank and others v Unitech Global Ltd and others. Both cases concern claims about the mis-selling of financial products linked to LIBOR.
In the first case, Graiseley Properties brought a claim against Barclays for rescission of two derivative contracts, linked to LIBOR, which it had entered into in conjunction with a loan facility, on the grounds that they had been unsuitable in the circumstances.
The Unitech case involved two separate claims: the ‘lender action’ in which Deutsche Bank and eight other lenders claimed repayment of a loan of $150m (£90m) against Unitech Global and its parent company Unitech as guarantor; and secondly the ‘swap action’ for $11m against Unitech in respect of an interest rate swap agreement, which was also pinned to LIBOR…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Bristows briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Bristows
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Bristows
The High Court has held that in certain circumstances the European Insolvency Regulations 1346/2000/EC may effectively extend the jurisdictional reach of the English courts.
A recent decision may result in a potentially more expansive basis for establishing jurisdiction over defendants in Europe.