LIBOR misrepresentation claims will proceed to trial
By Nick Cross
The Court of Appeal has handed down its much anticipated judgment in Graiseley Properties Ltd and others v Barclays Bank plc, heard jointly with Deutsche Bank and others v Unitech Global Ltd and others. Both cases concern claims about the mis-selling of financial products linked to LIBOR.
In the first case, Graiseley Properties brought a claim against Barclays for rescission of two derivative contracts, linked to LIBOR, which it had entered into in conjunction with a loan facility, on the grounds that they had been unsuitable in the circumstances.
The Unitech case involved two separate claims: the ‘lender action’ in which Deutsche Bank and eight other lenders claimed repayment of a loan of $150m (£90m) against Unitech Global and its parent company Unitech as guarantor; and secondly the ‘swap action’ for $11m against Unitech in respect of an interest rate swap agreement, which was also pinned to LIBOR…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Bristows briefing.
News from Bristows
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Bristows
The High Court has held that in certain circumstances the European Insolvency Regulations 1346/2000/EC may effectively extend the jurisdictional reach of the English courts.
A recent decision may result in a potentially more expansive basis for establishing jurisdiction over defendants in Europe.