Letters of credit — strict compliance and the use of banking ‘shorthand’
A fundamental principle underlining the use of a letter of credit (LC) as a means of payment security is that the documents presented under the LC must strictly comply with the requirements of the LC in order for the issuing bank to make payment.
In this case, the Commercial Court considers the doctrine of strict compliance and the extent to which so-called ‘trivial’ discrepancies will justify a refusal to pay under the LC. The court goes on to consider what is required under UCP 600 for a bank to give valid notification of a refusal to pay.
The claimant sellers entered a contract to sell a cargo of wheat bran pellets to buyers in China. Pursuant to the contract, the buyers procured the issue of an LC by the defendant, Shinhan Bank, under which the claimant was the beneficiary…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Ince & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Ince & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ince & Co
Affected parties must think about who will be the ’operator’ for the purposes of the new European regulations.
The commercial understanding of the phrases ‘as is’ or ‘as is where is’ has always been that a buyer must take a yacht in the condition in which she is found at the time defined in the contract.