Legal risks for non-US corporates
Every term, the US Supreme Court hears a handful of cases that present distinct legal risks for non-US corporates. This year is no exception. When it returns from summer recess in October 2013, the US Supreme Court will hear several cases that have the potential to increase the legal exposure of non-US corporates. For example, in DaimlerChrysler AG v Bauman, a case involving claims under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), the court will determine whether the due process clause of the Constitution permits US courts to exercise general personal jurisdiction over a non-US corporation for conduct outside of the US, based solely on the US contacts of an indirect corporate subsidiary…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Allen & Overy briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Allen & Overy
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Allen & Overy
Sylvia Kierszenbaum and Willem Van de Wiele have authored an article in The International Capital Markets Review.
The Provincial Court of Madrid has upheld a hybrid dispute resolution clause. The judgment is the first one in Spain that recognises the validity of hybrid arbitration clauses.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Advisers get stuck into the disentangling task, to unhitch troubled bank from group
Shell legal director Peter Rees is switching litigation control away from external counsel to a unified global team of in-housers