Lawbite: landlord liable for business rates after lease disclaimed
Many local authorities have been in the habit of looking to landlords for payment of business rates after disclaimer of a lease by an insolvent tenant; and many landlords have accepted liability. Until now, though, the courts have not ruled upon whether or not a landlord is liable in these circumstances.
The question is whether the landlord, following disclaimer, is ‘entitled to possession’ of the property; under section 65(1) of the Local Government Finance Act 1988, it is the person ‘entitled to possession’ who is liable for the rates.
In Schroder Exempt Property Unit Trust v Birmingham City Council  EWHC 2207 (Admin), the tenant went into liquidation and ceased to occupy the property, and the liquidator then disclaimed all interest in the lease…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Eversheds briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
Why register to The Lawyer
More relevant to you
News from Eversheds
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Eversheds
Case supports the view that a claim for breach of statutory duty is possible in relation to a contract award by a public body beyond the scope of the procurement regulations.
Tools that can be used to: minimise the risk of disputes; formulate and respond to claims; and resolve disputes.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Eversheds is no stranger to an international tie-up but now it’s in the market for the jewel in its global crown
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all