Law Commission report on pre-nups — what does it all mean?
The Law Commission for England and Wales has published its report on matrimonial property, needs and agreements. The commission set out its three main aims: first, to introduce a draft bill that will make qualifying nuptial agreements legally binding, so long as certain conditions and safeguards are met; second, to recommend that the Family Justice Council produces authoritative guidance on ‘financial needs’ so as to equip separating couples with the legal knowledge to reach agreement about finances and property without litigation; and third, to recommend that the government commissions a long-term study to assess whether a non-statutory formula for spousal maintenance (such as the sort used in Canada) would work in England and Wales.
Currently, when exercising its statutory discretion to divide assets on divorce, the family courts of England and Wales can take into account a prenuptial agreement if it has been freely entered into by each party with a full appreciation of its implications and if certain safeguards are adhered to.
The fundamental change recommended by the report is that pre-nuptial and post-nuptial agreements that satisfy prescribed criteria referred to below will be ‘qualifying nuptial agreements’ (QNAs) and will be legally binding, thereby restricting the court’s powers of asset distribution on divorce providing the financial needs of the parties and any children involved have been met…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Withers briefing.
News from Withers
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Withers
22 April 2014 marked ‘the largest reform of the family justice system any of us have seen or will see in our professional lifetimes’, according to the president of the Family Division.
Withers’ Graham Elliott discusses the points he found most interesting from this year’s Charity Tax Group annual meeting.
Analysis from The Lawyer
A merged Withers and Speechly Bircham would have scaled The Lawyer’s UK 200 with a turnover of about £170m, and created one of the world’s largest specialist private client teams. So what went wrong?