Laura Davidson acts for successful local authority in COP case ousting abusive live-in carers from an elderly woman’s home
London Borough of Redbridge v G, C and F  EWCOP 17, COP (Ms Justice Russell), 21 July 2014
G was a frail, 94-year-old lady from St Lucia who suffered from dementia and various other physical health problems, including double incontinence due to a rectal prolapse. She mobilised via a wheelchair. G was unmarried and had been a missionary for many years with the Seventh Day Adventist Church, as well as a midwife. Historically, she had had many friends and a rich social life within the community. C and F were from St Lucia. In 2011, C was introduced to G through a mutual friend. Very quickly, C moved into G’s house, followed by her husband F. Some months later, C cancelled G’s care package and began providing full-time care to G.
The case was initially brought under the inherent jurisdiction due to concerns that C and F were unduly influencing G and attempting to exploit her financially. It has had numerous reported hearings, including a hearing to determine whether or not G lacked the capacity to litigate and to make decisions about her finances, residence, care and contact. The judge accepted the opinion of independent consultant psychiatrist Dr Andrew Barker and determined that, due to dementia, she did not. Associated Press had also tried to become a party since G had stated her wish to speak to the Press, notwithstanding the anonymity order in place (In the matter of G [Adult] London Borough of Redbridge v G and Ors  EWCOP 1361). That application failed…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the No5 Chambers briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from No5 Chambers
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from No5 Chambers
How interesting: the public interest disclosure requirement of s.43B(1) of the Employment Rights Act
Not everything that may be interesting to the public is likely to be ‘in the public interest’. But is that a commonly held or understood view?
TUPE applies where a client decides to engage a new service provider instead of an existing one, but what if the client instructs the existing service provider to remove an employee from the contract before the TUPE transfer takes place?