Lack of full disclosure: special costs in failed Anton Piller Order
By Jordan Deering
In recent years, employers have increasingly sought and obtained Anton Piller Orders (APOs) where a departing employee leaves with confidential information. The strategy is often extremely effective: the employer recovers the confidential information and obtains significant leverage in the litigation, usually prompting settlement. While effective, APOs are not for the uninitiated — the courts have referred to this remedy as one of the ‘nuclear weapons’ of litigation. Employers and their counsel must exercise extreme caution when using APOs.
The British Columbia Supreme Court’s recent decision in Pierce v Jivraj 2014 BCSC 926 represents a warning for employers and their counsel in seeking an APO. In that case, the court ordered special costs personally against the plaintiff’s counsel for failure to meet the high burden of full disclosure in the APO application.
The action originated as a defamation suit by Mr Pierce against Mr Jivraj. Mr Pierce alleged that Mr Jivraj improperly published statements that various securities exchange commissions had imposed regulatory sanctions against Mr Pierce for ‘ill-gotten gains’ from stock manipulation…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Dentons briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Dentons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Dentons
ESMA follow-up papers address aspects of delegated legislation and technical standards to be made under MiFID 2 and MiFIR.
All Canadian businesses that are incorporated must complete an extra-provincial registration if they ‘carry on business’ in a province other than the jurisdiction of incorporation.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The continent’s boom in natural resources and renewable energy is sparking an infrastructure drive