Know your limitations — litigation and dispute resolution

Inserting an exclusion clause into a contract will reduce a party’s liability to pay damages but it will increase the chances of an injunction being made on the basis that damages are not an adequate remedy. That is the effect of the recent Court of Appeal decision in AB v CD [EWCA] Civ 229.

ŠŠIn AB v CD, the claimant sought an interim injunction restraining the defendant from terminating a licence to use an internet-based marketing platform.

The claimant argued that damages would not be an adequate remedy if it was subsequently decided (at an arbitration) that the defendant had wrongfully terminated the licence, because an exclusion clause in the licensing agreement prevented the claimant from recovering damages for all of its losses…

Click on the link below to read the rest of the Macfarlanes briefing.

Sign in or Register to continue reading this article

Sign in


It's quick, easy and free!

It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.

Register now

Why register to The Lawyer


Industry insight

In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.


Market intelligence

Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.


Email newsletters

Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.

More relevant to you

To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.

Briefings from Macfarlanes

View more briefings from Macfarlanes

Analysis from The Lawyer

View more analysis from The Lawyer

Browse This Firm’s


20 Cursitor St

Turnover (£m): 139.75
No. of lawyers: 260