Knocked down or on the up? Developers and the rights of light
In a recent blog post, Gateley discussed the impact a landmark case (Coventry v Lawrence) had upon the law of nuisance. The case was also significant in relation to injunctions and has rewritten the rules in this regard. The law as rewritten will potentially be of relevance to developers and the problem of rights of light.
A developer will be only too aware that a proposed development may infringe adjoining landowners’ rights of light and a balancing exercise needs to be taken as to whether any infringement of those rights of light will be actionable or not. If an actionable breach occurs, then the developer faces the risk of injunction. Following a 2010 case, this risk was highlighted when the developer was ordered to tear down newly constructed floors atop commercial premises.
For more than 100 years, the courts have followed a ‘working rule’ that states that the ‘starting remedy’ for a successful claimant in nuisance claims (which include actionable rights-of-light claims) is an injunction, unless a four-stage test can be satisfied by the defendant, in which case damages in lieu of an injunction should be awarded by the court…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Gateley briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Gateley
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Gateley
In property transactions a deposit is usually paid by the buyer. In the event that the buyer does not complete its purchase the seller is usually able to keep the deposit and any interest accrued on it.
Encourage shareholders to surrender their shares to avoid costly court payments.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The Law Society recently published guidance to assist solicitors draw up Shariah-compliant wills, causing outrage in some quarters. Gateley’s Haroon Rashid explains the facts.