Keeping property within company structures fails to protect husband from divorced wife's claims

In Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd and Others [2013] UKSC 34, The sums at stake were significant, as his wealth was assessed to be roughly £37.5m.

It is an extremely well-established principle that a company has its own legal identity that is separate to, and independent of, its owners. However, in this case, the husband had failed on numerous occasions to give full and frank disclosure regarding the relevant companies. The court found that there was implicit evidence that the properties were effectively held on a resulting trust for his own benefit.

Since the husband was therefore entitled to the properties in his personal capacity, the court was then able to ‘pierce the corporate veil’ to ensure that the wife was not deprived of assets to which she would otherwise have been entitled, but for them being held in the name of the companies…

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.

Briefings from Taylor Wessing

View more briefings from Taylor Wessing

Analysis from The Lawyer

  • singapore orchid

    Singapore: Cash course

    The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world

  • Money 317

    Crunch boom

    Financial disputes are starting to dominate the English courts as the long-awaited fallout from the downturn finally comes to town

View more analysis from The Lawyer


5 New Street Square

Turnover (£m): 228.00
No. of Lawyers: 860
No. of Lawyers (Asia Pacific): 79
Offices (Asia Pacific): 3