Keeping property within company structures fails to protect husband from divorced wife's claims
In Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd and Others  UKSC 34, The sums at stake were significant, as his wealth was assessed to be roughly £37.5m.
It is an extremely well-established principle that a company has its own legal identity that is separate to, and independent of, its owners. However, in this case, the husband had failed on numerous occasions to give full and frank disclosure regarding the relevant companies. The court found that there was implicit evidence that the properties were effectively held on a resulting trust for his own benefit.
Since the husband was therefore entitled to the properties in his personal capacity, the court was then able to ‘pierce the corporate veil’ to ensure that the wife was not deprived of assets to which she would otherwise have been entitled, but for them being held in the name of the companies…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Taylor Wessing
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Taylor Wessing
Tribunals will have the power to order that an employer who is unsuccessful at tribunal pay a financial penalty on top of any compensation due to the successful claimant.
With technological developments and the increase of CCTV in public places, the role of regulation and guidance will become increasingly important.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world
Financial disputes are starting to dominate the English courts as the long-awaited fallout from the downturn finally comes to town