Jurisdiction: can you be in two places at once?
By Paul Kirkpatrick
Choosing and including the correct type of jurisdiction clause in a contract is important.
We consider the case of Conductive Inkjet Technology Ltd and Uni-Pixel Displays Inc  EWHC 2968 (Ch), where the parties could not agree on a jurisdiction clause and the contract was deemed to have been made in two jurisdictions.
A jurisdiction clause refers to the parties’ choice of court in the event that a dispute arises. The choice of jurisdiction is important because it allows parties to avoid certain courts if they wish; it can save the time and cost of debating jurisdiction in the event of a dispute; it can increase the possibility of enforcement of a court judgment; and in the absence of an effective jurisdiction clause jurisdiction will be determined either by the appropriate rules or regulations…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
The Court of Appeal has found in favour of a business tenant and decided that a periodic tenancy had not been created in the intervening period.
Careful drafting is usually required for restrictive covenants to be enforceable, although Prophet plc v Huggett provides the exception to the rule.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…