Jurisdiction and misrepresentation: two important cases on the right to adjudicate
The new year has brought with it two interesting decisions from the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) that provide useful guidance on parties’ rights to adjudicate. In Twintec Ltd v Volkerfitzpatrick Ltd  EWHC 10 (TCC), the TCC held that because a letter of intent did not incorporate the terms of a particular subcontract, the appointment of the adjudicator was not valid, thus its decision was open to challenge. Similarly, in Hillcrest Homes Ltd v Beresford and Curbishley Ltd  EWHC 280 (TCC), the TCC denied a right to adjudicate on the basis that claims for negligent misstatement and misrepresentation were outside the ambit of the building contract’s adjudication provisions.
Volkerfitzpatrick had instructed Twintec to construct the floor slabs for a new wine warehouse and bottling plant for Accolade Wines. Volkerfitzpatrick issued a letter of intent to Twintec that required that the subcontractor carry out its works ‘in accordance with’ a standard form subcontract (DOM/2), with the intention that the letter of intent be superseded when the formal subcontract was agreed. In the event, the parties did not enter into a formal subcontract.
Accolade claimed that the floor was unfit for purpose and commenced proceedings for damages. Volkerfitzpatrick served notice of adjudication on Twintec for costs incurred in carrying out testing on the floor slabs to the tune of £850,000. In accordance with the adjudication clause in the DOM/2 subcontract, Volkerfitzpatrick applied to the RICS to have an adjudicator appointed…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing.
News from Addleshaw Goddard
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Addleshaw Goddard
Corporate News: ICSA Registrars Group guidance on articles of association and dividend distributions; and more
Addleshaw Goddard has published the June 2014 edition of Corporate News.
An employee cannot bring a breach-of-contract claim for losses flowing from the manner of dismissal even where the dismissal is in breach of an express contractual disciplinary procedure.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?
The past five years have not been easy for Addleshaw Goddard. The firm’s revenue fell 7 per cent from £173.1m to £161.9m between 2008/09 and 2010/11 and despite finances looking up in 2011/12, when Addleshaws reported a 30 per cent increase in net profit, it has shown no notable compound growth in turnover since 2007/08.