Judicial review — proposals for further reform
On 1 July 2013, followings its consultation ‘Judicial review: proposals for reform’, the government introduced significant changes to the judicial review process. The stated aim was to balance the need to ensure lawful public administration with the desire to reduce the number of unmeritorious claims being brought.
Changes included reducing the time limit for bringing a challenge against planning and procurement decisions and allowing the courts to filter out totally unmeritorious claims at an early stage in the process.
Despite these changes, the government believes that more needs to be done to prevent abuse of the judicial review process and has launched a further consultation entitled ‘Judicial review — proposals for further reform’ containing an ambitiously long list of issues that the government intends to tackle…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Eversheds briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Eversheds
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Eversheds
The most important advantage of international arbitration is the enforceability of its result, as a deal is only as reliable as the mechanism by which it can be made legally enforceable.
The Court of Appeal decision in CLP Holding Company Ltd v Singh (1) Kaur (2) prompts consideration of a common oversight in dealing with dilapidations claims.
Analysis from The Lawyer
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe