Judicial review — proposals for further reform
On 1 July 2013, followings its consultation ‘Judicial review: proposals for reform’, the government introduced significant changes to the judicial review process. The stated aim was to balance the need to ensure lawful public administration with the desire to reduce the number of unmeritorious claims being brought.
Changes included reducing the time limit for bringing a challenge against planning and procurement decisions and allowing the courts to filter out totally unmeritorious claims at an early stage in the process.
Despite these changes, the government believes that more needs to be done to prevent abuse of the judicial review process and has launched a further consultation entitled ‘Judicial review — proposals for further reform’ containing an ambitiously long list of issues that the government intends to tackle…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Eversheds briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Eversheds
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Eversheds
Recent consultation case highlights the court’s willingness to intervene in public sector decision making
All health sector bodies thinking about taking decisions that are subject to a period of public consultation should take heed of the High Court’s recent judgment.
The guidelines give EU businesses more certainty around what cloud service providers and cloud services consumers are responsible for when entering into contractual agreements.
Analysis from The Lawyer
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe