Judicial review of government's transposition of EU Waste Framework Directive dismissed
It has been held that commingled collections of paper, metal, plastic and glass are compliant with the requirements of the EU Waste Framework Directive and can continue to be carried out by local authorities provided the quality of the material collected does not compromise high-quality recycling or the overall aims of the directive — to preserve the environment and protect human health.
The claimants, the Campaign for Real Recycling (CRR) (who comprise a number of UK reprocessers) had argued that the ‘legal heart’ of the case was the differing interpretation of the Directive, while the ‘factual heart’ was the desire of waste management companies to maintain a regime whereby materials are collected together at the kerbside and separated at materials recycling facilities to the financial benefit of those firms…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
The High Court has determined preliminary issues in a professional negligence claim against a firm of conveyancing solicitors brought by a mortgage lender.
For employers who hold a sponsorship licence, getting it wrong could result in the revocation of that licence and a curtailment on their ability to recruit overseas workers.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.