Judicial review in planning — further changes are afoot
Following recent announcements in the press, including a front page headline in The Times this week, the government published the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill on 5 February 2014. Part 4 of the bill contains a number of important changes to be introduced that seek, in the words of the Lord Chancellor, to prevent judicial review from being a ‘brake on growth’. However, while it has been reported in the national press that the proposals mean that only individuals or groups with a financial interest in a case will be able to bring a challenge, this is inaccurate. The government originally proposed narrowing the test for standing so as to restrict the availability of judicial review to those with a ‘direct interest’, but that proposal has now been dropped.
The aim of reducing judicial review claims is nevertheless still being pursued: the financial measures in the bill are intended to deter would-be claimants by increasing the financial risks on those seeking judicial review. In summary, those measures include the following…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the No5 Chambers briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from No5 Chambers
Briefings from No5 Chambers
The Supreme Court judgment in P & Q and P v Cheshire West has finally been handed down. Barrister Laura Davidson from No5 Chambers comments on the decision.
This article focuses on the changes brought about by the decisions in Re A (Children: Habitual Residence)  UKSC 60 and LC (children)  UKSC 1.