Judicial review in planning — further changes are afoot
Following recent announcements in the press, including a front page headline in The Times this week, the government published the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill on 5 February 2014. Part 4 of the bill contains a number of important changes to be introduced that seek, in the words of the Lord Chancellor, to prevent judicial review from being a ‘brake on growth’. However, while it has been reported in the national press that the proposals mean that only individuals or groups with a financial interest in a case will be able to bring a challenge, this is inaccurate. The government originally proposed narrowing the test for standing so as to restrict the availability of judicial review to those with a ‘direct interest’, but that proposal has now been dropped.
The aim of reducing judicial review claims is nevertheless still being pursued: the financial measures in the bill are intended to deter would-be claimants by increasing the financial risks on those seeking judicial review. In summary, those measures include the following…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the No5 Chambers briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from No5 Chambers
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from No5 Chambers
How interesting: the public interest disclosure requirement of s.43B(1) of the Employment Rights Act
Not everything that may be interesting to the public is likely to be ‘in the public interest’. But is that a commonly held or understood view?
TUPE applies where a client decides to engage a new service provider instead of an existing one, but what if the client instructs the existing service provider to remove an employee from the contract before the TUPE transfer takes place?