Judgment could affect operators in waste management, utilities and manufacturing
In March 2012, the Court of Appeal gave judgment in the case of Barr and others v Biffa Waste Services Ltd , providing a decision that could have serious implications for operators in the waste management, utilities and manufacturing sectors whose businesses operate under environmental permits.
In this case, Biffa operated a landfill site close to a residential area for which it was issued a waste management permit that, amongst other stipulations, required the limiting and monitoring of odours. After commencing operations, Biffa and the Environment Agency began to receive complaints from local residents about odours coming from the site. The residents eventually formed an action group and issued proceedings against Biffa for common law private nuisance alleging that the odours had unduly interfered with the use and enjoyment of their land, affecting their quality of life.
Biffa argued that it had conducted operations in accordance with the terms of its waste management permit and without negligence and therefore it could not be liable in nuisance. The argument that a site had been operated in accordance with the relevant statutory and other regulations — known as statutory authority — has traditionally provided operators with a defence to private nuisance claims. In short, compliance with the terms of a permit to operate could provide a defence. In April 2011, the High Court agreed with Biffa and ruled that no claim in nuisance could succeed against an operator which had complied with the terms of its permit and had not been negligent…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Addleshaw Goddard
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Addleshaw Goddard
The Supreme Court in Coventry v Lawrence has altered the approach that courts will take when considering whether to grant injunctive relief or damages.
Data & Information E-Alerts — nuisance calls action plan; £50,000 fine for unlawful calls; simpler security classifications; and more
Addleshaw Goddard has released the 4 April 2014 edition of its Data & Information E-Alerts publication.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?
The past five years have not been easy for Addleshaw Goddard. The firm’s revenue fell 7 per cent from £173.1m to £161.9m between 2008/09 and 2010/11 and despite finances looking up in 2011/12, when Addleshaws reported a 30 per cent increase in net profit, it has shown no notable compound growth in turnover since 2007/08.