Jackson v Dear et al — derivative claims in Guernsey
In March 2013, the Guernsey Royal Court in Jackson v Dear et al provided clarity in relation to an intriguing area of company law, namely the derivative claim. A derivative action is a mechanism whereby a member or shareholder in a company brings proceedings on behalf of the company, where the company cannot, or will not, seek redress for an alleged wrong it has suffered.
The English common law position in relation to derivative claims was first stated in Foss v Harbottle  2 Hare 461, which said that if a company has suffered a wrong, the only proper claimant to seek redress for that wrong is the company itself, as the cause of action vests in the company, as opposed to anyone else (the ‘Foss v Harbottle Rule’). Foss v Harbottle also stated that the courts would not intervene in the internal management of a company acting within its powers.
A narrow set of exceptions to the Foss v Harbottle Rule were established, with one such exception being that a minority shareholder may bring a derivative action where the wrong suffered by the company amounts to fraud and the wrongdoers themselves are in the control of the company, thus being able to frustrate any claim by the company against them…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Mourant Ozannes briefing.
News from Mourant Ozannes
Briefings from Mourant Ozannes
Getting it right: how to make a successful application for the appointment of provisional liquidators
The main job of a judge is to determine and uphold rights of property ownership, so applications to appoint provisional liquidators tend to go against the judicial grain.
The States of Jersey have passed an amendment to the Employment (Jersey) Law 2003, incorporating a number of ‘family-friendly’ rights into the legislation.