It's a construction contract, but not as we know it
A recent case is of great interest to those that work within the UK construction industry. It is the first time that the court has considered whether a collateral warranty is a construction contract for the purposes of adjudication within the meaning of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.
In short, it was decided that a collateral warranty entered into between a third party and a contractor amounted to a construction contract for the purposes of the act. As a result, the beneficiary of the warranty (in this case, a tenant of the building) had the statutory right to refer a dispute under the warranty to adjudication, avoiding the need for it to go down the more time-consuming litigation or arbitration route…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mills & Reeve briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why