It's a construction contract, but not as we know it
A recent case is of great interest to those that work within the UK construction industry. It is the first time that the court has considered whether a collateral warranty is a construction contract for the purposes of adjudication within the meaning of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.
In short, it was decided that a collateral warranty entered into between a third party and a contractor amounted to a construction contract for the purposes of the act. As a result, the beneficiary of the warranty (in this case, a tenant of the building) had the statutory right to refer a dispute under the warranty to adjudication, avoiding the need for it to go down the more time-consuming litigation or arbitration route…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mills & Reeve briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Mills & Reeve
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mills & Reeve
The Court of Appeal has handed down its decision in Mitchell v News Group, resolving recent uncertainty about the implementation of Jackson reforms — at least for the time being.
There is an implied term allowing a paying responding party under an adjudication award six years from the date of payment to challenge the adjudicator’s decision.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why