It’ll cost you: employer ordered to reimburse employee for EAT fees
In a case Hogan Lovells reported on three weeks ago, an employee successfully appealed against a tribunal decision that documents relating to settlement discussions between him and his employer were not ‘without prejudice’.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has now given a further judgment ordering the employer in the case to repay to the employee the EAT fees that he incurred in bringing that appeal. Following the introduction of fees in the employment tribunal and the EAT last year, there is now an issue fee of £400 and a further hearing fee of £1,200 to pursue an appeal against a tribunal decision…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump