It is not outside the scope of reasonable adjustments to require an employer to fund private medical treatment
The decision by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Croft Vets v Butcher may be surprising and even alarming to employers. This is despite the EAT emphasising that its decision did not concern the funding of private medical treatment in general, but a payment for a specific form of support to enable the employee to return to work and cope with difficulties experienced there. In this case, the private medical treatment had been recommended by the private consultant psychiatrist that the employee had been referred to by the employer. It follows that once the employer undertakes to refer the employee to a medical professional, they should be cautious about ignoring the recommendations.
Under the Equality Act 2010, every employer has a duty to make reasonable adjustments where a ‘provision, practice or criterion’ puts a disabled employee (or job applicant) at a substantial disadvantage compared with others. Reasonable adjustments can be wide ranging and may include alterations to the employer’s premises or employee’s working arrangements. Whether an adjustment is reasonable will vary according to factors such as the size of the business and practicalities…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Winckworth Sherwood briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Winckworth Sherwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Winckworth Sherwood
In Southern v Britannia Hotels Ltd, an employment tribunal granted a significant award of £19,500 to a zero-hours worker who was subjected to harassment by her line manager.
In Williams and Leeds United Football Club the High Court considered whether the claimant was entitled to be paid 12 months’ notice pay, despite having been found by his employer to have sent pornographic images to three individuals five years earlier.