It is not outside the scope of reasonable adjustments to require an employer to fund private medical treatment
The decision by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Croft Vets v Butcher may be surprising and even alarming to employers. This is despite the EAT emphasising that its decision did not concern the funding of private medical treatment in general, but a payment for a specific form of support to enable the employee to return to work and cope with difficulties experienced there. In this case, the private medical treatment had been recommended by the private consultant psychiatrist that the employee had been referred to by the employer. It follows that once the employer undertakes to refer the employee to a medical professional, they should be cautious about ignoring the recommendations.
Under the Equality Act 2010, every employer has a duty to make reasonable adjustments where a ‘provision, practice or criterion’ puts a disabled employee (or job applicant) at a substantial disadvantage compared with others. Reasonable adjustments can be wide ranging and may include alterations to the employer’s premises or employee’s working arrangements. Whether an adjustment is reasonable will vary according to factors such as the size of the business and practicalities…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Winckworth Sherwood briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Winckworth Sherwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Winckworth Sherwood
James Lynas, a partner at Winckworth Sherwood specialising in education employment law, highlights easily avoidable human resources errors that can cost schools dear.
Name or shame: complying with the name and charitable status provisions of the Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies Act 2014
This note focuses on two key provisions of the Act which deal with the requirement to display the name and charitable status of registered societies.