Is your Safe Harbor certification really ‘safe’?
By Jim Halpert and Haris Khan
On 21 January, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced 12 proposed settlements with companies accused of falsely claiming that they complied with the US-EU Safe Harbor Framework.
These companies range from three National Football League teams to a debt collection firm. They handle various types of consumer data, including sensitive health and employment data.
The FTC alleged in its complaints that the 12 companies deceptively claimed that they held current US-EU Safe Harbor and/or US-Swiss Safe Harbor certifications through statements in their privacy policies and/or by displaying the Safe Harbor certification mark on their websites, even though the companies had let their certifications lapse…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
The interpretation of the scope of application of the investor’s right to withdraw from any contracts for the placement of door-to-door financial products has again captured the attention of all players.
Tax Newsletter — July/August 2014: SAT strengthens reporting request under China CFC rules; and more
DLA Piper has released the July/August edition of its Tax Newsletter, which provides a review of PRC and Hong Kong tax developments.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions