No5 Chambers

Bar top 30 position: 6=

Is this the end for swap mis-selling claims? The Appeal in Green & Rowley v RBS

By Philip Mantle

One of the difficulties encountered when advising clients as to the merits of their claim that they have been mis-sold an interest rate hedging product (IRHP), usually an interest rate swap, is the paucity of decided case law concerning the sale of such products.

There have been only two reported decisions concerning the (mis) selling of interest rate swaps: the Scottish case of Grant Estates Ltd v RBS [2012] CSOH 133 and the solitary English decision of Green & Rowley v RBS [2012] EWHC 3661. In both cases, the claims of mis-selling against the banks were dismissed.

Green was subsequently taken upon appeal, heard in July 2013, and the findings of the court at first instance were upheld. Although the decision was known in July, the Court of Appeal has only recently handed down formal judgment on 9 October 2013. As this decision represents the solitary appellate authority within the field of swap mis-selling, the formal reasoning behind the court’s judgment has been keenly awaited by both claimant and defendants alike…

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the No5 Chambers briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.

Briefings from No5 Chambers

  • Holiday pay has to include commission

    In Lock v British Gas, the European Court of Justice decided that holiday pay under the Working Time Directive has to include commission if salary is made up of commission.

  • Understanding serious brain injury

    At any time, as those who have suffered a serious injury to the brain or have been close to someone who has will know, your life can be turned upside down in less than a fated second.

View more briefings from No5 Chambers


Fountain Court
Steelhouse Lane
B4 6DR

Silks: 26
Juniors: 213
Head of chambers: Paul Bleasdale QC
Practice director: Tony McDaid
Office manager: Sandra Astbury