Is the answer still blowing in the wind after the GM canola case?
By Andrew Gill
If Australia is to meet its aspirations of providing high-quality food in high volume to the rest of the world, it must ensure that agribusinesses can operate with certainty in the market, rather than being left ‘blowing in the wind’.
Despite strongly opposing opinions presented in the GM canola case, discussed below, both genetically modified (GM) and organic supporters agree on one front; the law is uncertain and it should be amended. As it stands, the law does not provide protection for organic farmers or certainty for GM growers. With both the GM and organic industries increasing rapidly, this is an issue which will only become more pressing.
The long-running dispute between GM canola farmer Michael Baxter and his neighbour, organic farmer Steve Marsh, was finally decided by the Western Australian Supreme Court in a landmark decision. The case, watched closely by interested parties globally, highlighted the growing conflict of interests and rights between organic and GM farmers. However, despite the importance of the judgment, the case has failed to provide any real certainty for the agribusiness industry…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Minter Ellison briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Minter Ellison
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Minter Ellison
Full Federal Court rules that partly ‘aspirational’ grievance policy was contractual and criticises company's investigation
This decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court is another sharp reminder to employers about the need to ensure their policies do not inadvertently become contractual.
The Federal Court of Australia announced two further decisions that provide additional guidance to parties to a patent licence.