Is Japan over the rainbow? Foreign LGBT executives and Japanese immigration law
By Koji Ishikawa, Lawrence Carter and Keitaro Uzawa
On 26 June 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States issued two rulings that significantly advanced same-sex marriage rights in America.
In United States v Windsor (570 U.S. (2013)), the court considered whether a provision of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that defined ‘marriage’ and ‘spouse’ so as to exclude same-sex partners was constitutional. The majority held that DOMA was unconstitutional ‘as a depravation of the equal liberty of persons’ protected by the Constitution.
In Hollingsworth v Perry (570 U.S. (2013)), the Supreme Court held that the proponents of Proposition 8, which would have amended California’s state constitution so as to limit marriage to a union between one man and one woman, did not have standing to challenge a lower court’s decisions and should not have been permitted to intervene to defend Proposition 8…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
The US Supreme Court has invalidated federal aggregate limits on individual political contributions in the case McCutcheon et al v Federal Election Commission.
Law à la Mode — April 2014: fashion flair transforms wearable technologies; delivering IT services in the retail sector; and more
DLA Piper has released the April 2014 issue of its Law à la Mode publication.
Analysis from The Lawyer
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions
The fragile refinance market is back in rude health and US-style alternative lenders are stepping up with innovative structures to sustain the recovery