Is Japan over the rainbow? Foreign LGBT executives and Japanese immigration law
By Koji Ishikawa, Lawrence Carter and Keitaro Uzawa
On 26 June 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States issued two rulings that significantly advanced same-sex marriage rights in America.
In United States v Windsor (570 U.S. (2013)), the court considered whether a provision of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that defined ‘marriage’ and ‘spouse’ so as to exclude same-sex partners was constitutional. The majority held that DOMA was unconstitutional ‘as a depravation of the equal liberty of persons’ protected by the Constitution.
In Hollingsworth v Perry (570 U.S. (2013)), the Supreme Court held that the proponents of Proposition 8, which would have amended California’s state constitution so as to limit marriage to a union between one man and one woman, did not have standing to challenge a lower court’s decisions and should not have been permitted to intervene to defend Proposition 8…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
Cour de Cassation quashes decision that disregarded ICC rule on time limits to arbitrator challenges — two takeaways
This milestone decision further limits the scope for French courts to annul arbitration awards and reinforces the efficiency of France-seated arbitral proceedings.
This decision is in line with a possible judicial trend towards enforceability of good faith obligations under English law.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions