Is it correct that a contract can only be implied between an individual worker and an end user where it is necessary to do so?
By Clare Gilroy-Scott
It is generally accepted that where a worker is supplied to work for an end user through a recruitment business, a contract can only be implied between an individual and the end user where it is necessary to do so in order to give effect to the reality of the relationship (James v Greenwich LBC).
The concept of when it might be ‘necessary’ was tested by the Employment Appeal Tribunal in the case of Smith v Carillion. In this case, the claimant claimed he had been dismissed by the end user because of raising health and safety concerns in his capacity as shop steward and the union health and safety representative. He had been placed on a construction blacklist as a result of his TU activities…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Goodman Derrick briefing.
News from Goodman Derrick
Briefings from Goodman Derrick
Following a six-year project by the Law Commission, the Inheritance and Trustees’ Powers Act 2014 came into force on 1 October.
A recent decision in the Birmingham County Court has changed the way in which it was understood the legislation relating to tenancies and deposits was meant to operate.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Active financial management is vital, but with firms looking more closely at the process of debt and fee collection, the personal touch still counts
The lure of the law can kick in at any stage of life. We speak to four individuals who have made a radical switch to a legal career