IP Matters — winter 2014: unjustified threats of patent infringement — where next?
By Patrick Wheeler
The UK laws relating to unjustified threats of infringement of patents, trademarks and designs have proved a minefield for rights owners and legal advisers alike. The Civil Procedure Rules set an expectation that parties to a dispute will set out details of their claim and defence before starting court proceedings, but an ill-considered letter before action alleging infringement of these rights can result instead in a claim of unjustified threats being made by the party that is accused of infringement.
The underlying policy appears to be that the owner of a registered intellectual property (IP) right or unregistered design is entitled to threaten proceedings for infringement against primary infringers (such as manufacturers or principal importers), but threats of infringement being made against those further down the supply chain are to be discouraged.
This is to prevent an IP rights holder from causing major disruption to the business of a competitor by threatening a retailer of an alleged infringing product, knowing that the retailer is likely to contact the manufacturer or main importer and say that it does not wish to be involved in an IP dispute and so it is likely to seek to return the goods to the original supplier…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Collyer Bristow briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Collyer Bristow
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Collyer Bristow
FCA swaps review: has the independent reviewer fulfilled its function to ensure a fair and reasonable outcome?
Holmcroft Properties’ case was included in the review process which the FCA agreed with Barclays (and other banks) the banks should undertake to provide redress to customers who had been missold IRHP.
Once damaging personal information is in the public domain, it is hard to regain control of it.