Interim costs orders: a power and a presumption
In Crociani v Crociani  JCA 095, the Court of Appeal ruled, for the first time, that it has the power to make an order for an interim payment on account of costs. As well as clarifying whether it had the power to make such an order, the court also discussed whether a presumption to do so exists as a matter of principle and suggested certain revisions to both the Court of Appeal (Civil) Rules 1964 and to the Royal Court Rules 2004.
The appellants (against whom the Court of Appeal had made an order for the costs arising out of an unsuccessful application for a stay of proceedings on the ground of forum non conveniens) argued that the Court of Appeal had no power to make an order for an interim payment on account of a liability for costs. The position in Jersey differed materially from that in England and Wales, in which the court has a wide discretion to order a payment on account under Rule 44.3(8) of the Civil Procedure Rules.
The Court of Appeal disagreed. While there is no statutory equivalent to Rule 44.3(8), it does not necessarily follow that Jersey’s Court of Appeal lacks the discretion to order a payment on account. Rather, the power to order an interim payment on account of costs arises under article 16 of the Court of Appeal (Jersey) Law 1961, which states that ‘the costs of and incidental to proceedings in the Court of Appeal…shall be in the discretion of the court, and the court shall have full power to determine by whom and to what extent the costs are to be paid’. The wording of article 16 and the discretion that it grants the Court of Appeal was wide enough to accommodate a power to make an interim order for costs on account…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Mourant Ozannes briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Mourant Ozannes
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mourant Ozannes
The Cayman Islands’ Grand Court (Amendment) Law 2014 introduces the legislative clarification of the law providing for interim relief in aid of foreign proceedings.
The Court of Appeal has considered whether an employee who was unwilling to work out his notice period could treat the contract as at an end and work for a competitor.