Interest rate swap test-case update
Walker Morris’s earlier briefing explained that businessmen Rowley and Green had sought to pursue RBS for compensation following an interest rate swap deal that left them significantly out of pocket. The High Court held that RBS did not make any misstatements to Rowley and Green and did not provide any advice in connection with the interest rate swap, and as such the bank was not held liable for their losses. The case, which has been seen by some as something of a test case for the thousands of businesses that have accused Britain’s banks of financial mis-selling, was then referred to the Court of Appeal at the end of July.
The court’s written judgment has been reserved and is expected in the autumn, but while full details are awaited we do already know that the Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed Rowley and Green’s appeal and endorsed the High Court’s decision. It is also clear that the decision in this case was very much fact specific, and commentary to date suggests that the claimants and their representatives are keen to suggest that the decision is of limited wider application…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
A misrepresentation is a statement that induces entry into a contract and that turns out to be false.
Marshalling is an equitable remedy for achieving fairness between two or more secured creditors of the same debtor.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.
New EU rules and lawyers’ increased comfort with digital formats are sparking a sea-change in the way law firms manage their documents