Injunctions: more flexibility about awarding damages instead of an injunction
By Robin Biela
The Supreme Court has commented on the test for awarding damages instead of an injunction (Coventry v Lawrence  UKSC 13). While the case concerned a complaint about noise nuisance, the judgment will be relevant as to whether the court will award damages instead of an injunction where a developer infringes a neighbour’s right of light.
The case strongly criticises the recent tendency to mechanically apply existing principles and award an injunction rather than damages. Instead, the Supreme Court suggests that courts should adopt a more flexible approach when awarding a remedy. If the approach suggested by the Supreme Court is adopted in practice, it is likely that fewer injunctions will be granted and that damages will become a more common alternative remedy.
In previous cases, the courts have worked on the principle that an injunction will be awarded unless there are exceptional reasons not to…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Nabarro briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Nabarro
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Nabarro
Choosing the right adjudicator to decide your dispute can be one of the most important and difficult aspects of the adjudication process.
In this case, the court considered a payment of funds into court as an alternative remedy to specific performance to deliver security documentation.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Nabarro senior partner and self-confessed “IT geek” Graham Stedman is heralding a major set of investments in technology ahead of the firm’s move to 125 London Wall this year.
Clients are more willing to bring claims against professional service providers but the risk to defendants is not as dramatic as it might seem