Injunctions: more flexibility about awarding damages instead of an injunction
By Robin Biela
The Supreme Court has commented on the test for awarding damages instead of an injunction (Coventry v Lawrence  UKSC 13). While the case concerned a complaint about noise nuisance, the judgment will be relevant as to whether the court will award damages instead of an injunction where a developer infringes a neighbour’s right of light.
The case strongly criticises the recent tendency to mechanically apply existing principles and award an injunction rather than damages. Instead, the Supreme Court suggests that courts should adopt a more flexible approach when awarding a remedy. If the approach suggested by the Supreme Court is adopted in practice, it is likely that fewer injunctions will be granted and that damages will become a more common alternative remedy.
In previous cases, the courts have worked on the principle that an injunction will be awarded unless there are exceptional reasons not to…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Nabarro briefing.
News from Nabarro
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Nabarro
This case has highlighted the question of whether there is a ‘gap’ in clause 20 of the FIDIC conditions where arbitration is chosen as the final method of dispute resolution.
Lord Justice Jackson gave a keynote speech at the Costs Law and Practice Conference on 30 September, making a number of comments on the progress of his reforms.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Nabarro senior partner and self-confessed “IT geek” Graham Stedman is heralding a major set of investments in technology ahead of the firm’s move to 125 London Wall this year.
Clients are more willing to bring claims against professional service providers but the risk to defendants is not as dramatic as it might seem