In the matter of the representation of A Limited and in the matter of the F Foundation  JRC 075
This is the first case in which the Royal Court has had to give full consideration to the law applicable to a Jersey foundation, the Foundations (Jersey) Law 2009. This was an application for directions by the qualified member of the F Foundation’s council.
The Foundation was incorporated under the Foundations Law. The founders were two BVI registered companies originally owned by two Russian nationals, B and G. The Foundation’s council had three members: A Limited (the qualified member, registered under the Financial Services (Jersey) Law 1998 to carry on trust company business) and two lawyers (D and E) from a Cyprus law firm, which acted for B. The Foundation’s guardian was another BVI registered company, namely C Limited (“the Guardian”).
The Foundation’s original beneficiaries were B and C, but C disclaimed so that B was the sole beneficiary. He also beneficially owned the two founding companies and the Guardian, all of which were administered in Cyprus through D and E’s firm. The Foundation owned a complex structure under which were held substantial real estate and other assets in Russia and Eastern Europe…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mourant Ozannes briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Mourant Ozannes
Briefings from Mourant Ozannes
What is the role of the Royal Court of Jersey in trustee applications for directions regarding disclosure of trust information?
A recent application has raised the issue of the function of the court, namely whether the court was exercising its own discretion in supervising, and intervening, in the administration of a trust.
Royal Court clarifies limits of customary law exception in respect of time-barred breach-of-trust claims brought by incoming trustee
Where a newly incorporated PTC recently appointed as successor trustee seeks to bring claims for breach of trust against predecessors, it will not be able to benefit from empêchement d’agir.