Addleshaw Goddard

UK 200 2013 position: 23

Implied licence: you get what you’re given unless you expressly ask for more

The defendant entered into an agreement with an NHS trust for a period of seven years subject to a provision that the agreement could be extended in six-month blocks for up to a further three years. The defendant was granted an implied licence to use RIS software by the claimant (which at the time was a sister company of the defendant) for the purpose of providing the services under the agreement. In September 2010, the agreement was extended for six months.

In December 2010, the agreement was further extended by 30 months. The claimant and defendant had been sold to separate entities and were no longer sister companies. The claimant argued that the implied licence had come to an end after the seven-year term and thereafter a fresh implied licence came into effect for which the defendant should pay royalty fees…

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.

Briefings from Addleshaw Goddard

View more briefings from Addleshaw Goddard

Analysis from The Lawyer

  • pannone.jpg

    Another Mancunian merger for Slater & Gordon?

    Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?

  • Addleshaws

    Number crunching: Addleshaw Goddard

    The past five years have not been easy for Addleshaw Goddard. The firm’s revenue fell 7 per cent from £173.1m to £161.9m between 2008/09 and 2010/11 and despite finances looking up in 2011/12, when Addleshaws reported a 30 per cent increase in net profit, it has shown no notable compound growth in turnover since 2007/08.

View more analysis from The Lawyer


Milton Gate
60 Chiswell Street

Turnover (£m): 166.50
No. of Lawyers: 592