Implied licence: you get what you’re given unless you expressly ask for more
The defendant entered into an agreement with an NHS trust for a period of seven years subject to a provision that the agreement could be extended in six-month blocks for up to a further three years. The defendant was granted an implied licence to use RIS software by the claimant (which at the time was a sister company of the defendant) for the purpose of providing the services under the agreement. In September 2010, the agreement was extended for six months.
In December 2010, the agreement was further extended by 30 months. The claimant and defendant had been sold to separate entities and were no longer sister companies. The claimant argued that the implied licence had come to an end after the seven-year term and thereafter a fresh implied licence came into effect for which the defendant should pay royalty fees…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Addleshaw Goddard
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Addleshaw Goddard
Addleshaw Goddard has released the 16 October 2014 issue of its Data Issues Roundup, which provides a weekly round-up of data issues.
This round-up includes costs and unreasonable refusals to engage in ADR and four recent cases considering the refusal by one party to engage in ADR.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?