Implied duty of co-operation in shipbuilding and offshore construction contracts — a change in the law?
By Chris Kidd
In any construction project, a degree of co-operation will be required between the buyer and the builder to facilitate successful completion of the project. It is common to provide expressly in the contract in what specific ways the parties, in particular the buyer, will co-operate, for instance by allowing access to the site and providing timely instructions or approvals. Where co-operation from one of the parties is required but it is not addressed by the express terms of the contract, a duty of co-operation may nevertheless be implied in particular circumstances.
Terms can be implied into contracts in a number of circumstances. When determining whether a term should be implied, the courts or arbitrators will consider what the contract, read as a whole against the relevant background, would reasonably be understood to mean and whether it is necessary to imply a term to make the contract work or because it is usual for the term to be implied in the circumstances. In either case, a term will only be implied where it is both necessary and reasonable to do so in the circumstances and by reference to the terms that have been agreed…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Ince & Co briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Ince & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ince & Co
The ECJ has confirmed that the Brussels Regulation does not prevent a EU member state court from recognising and enforcing an anti-suit injunction granted by arbitrators.
Court of Appeal reverses 20-year service life warranty decision following the Robin Rigg grouting failures
MT Højgaard is not responsible for the cost of remedial work to the grouted connections of the foundations at the Robin Rigg offshorewind farm, overturning last year’s first instance decision.