Implications of the Intellectual Property Act 2014 for businesses — guidance published on 30 June 2014
By John Coldham
Following the passing of the Intellectual Property Act 2014 on 14 May, the Intellectual Property Office has issued some useful guidance on its implications for businesses…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
A settlement agreement between Stretchline Intellectual Properties Ltd (Stretchline) and H&M Hennes & Mauritz UK Ltd (H&M) precluded H&M from challenging the validity of the patent concerned.
Wragges has prepared this glossary of terms to assist your understanding of some of the more common terminology used in insurance policies that you may come across in the construction industry.