Implications for LLP members given worker protection
By Jacqui Piper
The Supreme Court ruling in the case of Clyde & Co LLP v Bates van Winkelhof means that members of limited liability partnerships (LLPs) now have certain quasi-employment protections and may need to be automatically enrolled into a pension scheme.
When LLPs were established in 2000 HMRC operated on the basis that members of LLPs were self-employed and they were taxed on that basis. HMRC challenged this position and, from 6 April 2014, LLP members who receive a salary are required to be treated as employees for tax and NI purposes. The position regarding LLP members who are not salaried remained unchanged.
In the Clyde & Co LLP case, Ms Bates van Winkelhof was removed from an LLP partnership allegedly as a result of her ‘blowing the whistle’ having reported alleged criminal activity. The case considered whether Ms Bates van Winkelhof was a ‘worker’ for the purposes of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and therefore able to bring claims for detriment under the whistleblowing regime and discrimination…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
The case of Hershaw and ors v Sheffield City Council is a reminder to employers to be careful about how and what they communicate to their employees.
Employers have a duty to prevent illegal working and are obliged to carry out prescribed document checks on individuals before they commence work.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…