Implications for Commonwealth funding as a result of Williams High Court decision
By Paul McGinness and Tom Galvin
The High Court has delivered its highly anticipated decision in Williams v Commonwealth of Australia  HCA 23 (Williams [No. 2]).
The court unanimously held that the legislation, which purported to provide legislative authority for the Commonwealth to enter into agreements to make payments, is invalid in its operation with respect to a funding agreement between the Commonwealth and Scripture Union Queensland (SUQ) for the provision of chaplaincy services in schools.
While not all Commonwealth funding programmes will be jeopardised by this decision, it will raise doubt about the legality of other funding programmes that were the subject of the same legislation…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Minter Ellison briefing.
News from Minter Ellison
Briefings from Minter Ellison
How would an organisation handle the reinstatement of a dismissed employee while the matter is being heard?
Conflicts of interest can be an inevitable part of employment for university academics, especially when performing different roles.