Implications for Commonwealth funding as a result of Williams High Court decision
By Paul McGinness and Tom Galvin
The High Court has delivered its highly anticipated decision in Williams v Commonwealth of Australia  HCA 23 (Williams [No. 2]).
The court unanimously held that the legislation, which purported to provide legislative authority for the Commonwealth to enter into agreements to make payments, is invalid in its operation with respect to a funding agreement between the Commonwealth and Scripture Union Queensland (SUQ) for the provision of chaplaincy services in schools.
While not all Commonwealth funding programmes will be jeopardised by this decision, it will raise doubt about the legality of other funding programmes that were the subject of the same legislation…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Minter Ellison briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Minter Ellison
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Minter Ellison
The ASX has amended its operating rules to enhance disclosure requirements and facilitate the expansion of exchange traded funds.
Government to crack down on multinationals and profit-shifting, while encouraging small enterprises.