Implications for Commonwealth funding as a result of Williams High Court decision

By Paul McGinness and Tom Galvin

The High Court has delivered its highly anticipated decision in Williams v Commonwealth of Australia [2014] HCA 23 (Williams [No. 2]).

The court unanimously held that the legislation, which purported to provide legislative authority for the Commonwealth to enter into agreements to make payments, is invalid in its operation with respect to a funding agreement between the Commonwealth and Scripture Union Queensland (SUQ) for the provision of chaplaincy services in schools.

While not all Commonwealth funding programmes will be jeopardised by this decision, it will raise doubt about the legality of other funding programmes that were the subject of the same legislation…

Click on the link below to read the rest of the Minter Ellison briefing.

Sign in or Register to continue reading this article

Sign in

Register

It's quick, easy and free!

It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.

Register now

Why register to The Lawyer

 

Industry insight

In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.

 

Market intelligence

Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.

 

Email newsletters

Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.

More relevant to you

To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.

Overview

Level 40, Governor Macquarie Tower
1 Farrer Place
Sydney
2000
Australia
http://www.minterellison.com

Jurisdiction: Australia
No. of offices: 14
No. of qualified lawyers: 1085