Immigration status does not equate to race
Two migrant domestic workers from Nigeria, who suffered abuse, exploitation and ill treatment at the hands of their UK employers, brought claims of direct and indirect race discrimination in the Employment Tribunal (ET). One initially succeeded in her claim of direct race discrimination and the other lost both claims. Both cases were appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), which held that the claimants had not been directly or indirectly discriminated against because of their nationality/race. The cases were appealed to the Court of Appeal, which upheld the EAT’s decisions.
Under the Equality Act 2010, direct race discrimination occurs where, because of race (including nationality), an employer treats an employee less favourably than it treats or would treat others. Indirect race discrimination occurs where: a) an employer applies a provision, criterion or practice (PCP) to an employee who is of a particular racial group; b) the employer applies that PCP to persons not of the same racial group as the employee; c) the PCP puts persons of the employee’s racial group at a particular disadvantage when compared to other persons; d) the particular employee is also placed at a disadvantage; and e) the employer cannot justify the PCP by showing it to be a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Winckworth Sherwood briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Winckworth Sherwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Winckworth Sherwood
The Homes and Communities Agency has removed the requirement for pre-emption rights to remain effective on shared ownership properties following final staircasing to 100 per cent ownership.
This article considers the scope of this rule and provides a checklist of the key points taxpayers should consider to benefit from this rule and avert future charges.