Ignore requests to mediate at your peril
In Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust  EWCA Civ 567, the Court of Appeal held that the court should not compel parties to mediate; however, a refusal to engage in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) could amount to unreasonable conduct and expose a party to cost penalties.
The court has taken this principal further in what has been described as a ‘modest extension’ of the principle set out in Halsey. In PGF II SA v OMFS Company 1 Ltd  EWCA Civ 1288, the Court of Appeal considered that, as a general rule, a failure to respond to an invitation to participate in ADR is itself unreasonable, irrespective of whether a party has a good reason not to mediate.
The claimant claimed some £1.9m in relation to alleged breaches of a tenant’s repairing covenant. Following two Part 36 offers from the claimant (in October 2010 and April 2011), it wrote to the defendant inviting it to participate in mediation; it repeated the invitation some months later. Both requests to mediate went unanswered. The claimant sent a further Part 36 offer three weeks before the trial. The defendant also made a Part 36 offer in April 2011 and it was this offer that was accepted by the claimant the day before the trial was due to start…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
Weatherford Global Products Ltd v Hydropath Holdings Ltd and Others concerned the manufacture and supply of the ‘Clearwell Product’.
Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co’s real-estate experts bring you the latest property law issues and provide action points to help you and your organisation.