Ignore requests to mediate at your peril
In Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust  EWCA Civ 567, the Court of Appeal held that the court should not compel parties to mediate; however, a refusal to engage in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) could amount to unreasonable conduct and expose a party to cost penalties.
The court has taken this principal further in what has been described as a ‘modest extension’ of the principle set out in Halsey. In PGF II SA v OMFS Company 1 Ltd  EWCA Civ 1288, the Court of Appeal considered that, as a general rule, a failure to respond to an invitation to participate in ADR is itself unreasonable, irrespective of whether a party has a good reason not to mediate.
The claimant claimed some £1.9m in relation to alleged breaches of a tenant’s repairing covenant. Following two Part 36 offers from the claimant (in October 2010 and April 2011), it wrote to the defendant inviting it to participate in mediation; it repeated the invitation some months later. Both requests to mediate went unanswered. The claimant sent a further Part 36 offer three weeks before the trial. The defendant also made a Part 36 offer in April 2011 and it was this offer that was accepted by the claimant the day before the trial was due to start…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
The case of FOA (Kaltoft) v Billund (C-354/13) is the first time the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has considered issues concerning obesity-based discrimination. More specifically, it has looked at whether obesity can be classed as a ‘disability’ under the Equal Treatment Directive.
Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co’s dedicated insolvency litigation team brings you its monthly update on the issues affecting the insolvency and fraud investigation industry.