Hungary: arbitration agreement is not binding on insolvent claimant
By Zoltán Fabók
A recently published ruling of a Hungarian regional court of appeal has held that the enforcement of claims by an insolvent claimant in arbitration is contradictory to the aims of the insolvency proceedings and to a creditor’s interests. Consequently, an arbitration agreement may not be binding in Hungary in circumstances where a potential claimant is insolvent.
This conclusion is not inconsistent with the approach taken in some other European jurisdictions, on the basis of the significance of insolvency proceedings. Ongoing arbitral proceedings can be suspended or even terminated on the basis of insolvency, and parties may be prevented from commencing an arbitration once insolvency proceedings are under way against one of them. The question of whether this is justifiable in the arbitration context is debatable, but the extraordinary nature of insolvency proceedings often overrules contracts and property law. It is harder in those circumstances to make the case for arbitration being an exception to these rules.
The Hungarian Insolvency Act indirectly prohibits arbitral proceedings in circumstances where there is an outstanding monetary claim against the insolvent party. This is because once insolvency proceedings have been commenced against a debtor, any monetary claims against the debtor can only be enforced by lodging the claim with the administrator. If the administrator does not recognise the claim then, as a general rule, the bankruptcy court has exclusive jurisdiction to decide the disputed claim. Since it has exclusive jurisdiction, it logically follows as a matter of Hungarian law that once liquidation proceedings have been commenced, no arbitration proceedings can be initiated against an insolvent debtor…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
The Australian Taxation Office released a draft ruling on the Goods and Services Tax treatment of bitcoin transactions on 20 August 2014.
DLA Piper’s ‘Life sciences: patent extension strategies and antitrust global update’ video covers global antitrust and competition issues including product hopping and reverse payment patents.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Regulators are ramping up the pressure in the aftermath of recession, leaving firms to compete for compliance and restructuring work
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.