House of Representatives passes SAFETY Act amendment
By Brian E Finch
The US House of Representatives took a major positive step towards increasing the nation’s cyber-security posture when, on a voice vote, it passed HR 3696: the National Cybersecurity and Critical Infrastructure Protection Act.
The NCCIP bill, co-sponsored by House Homeland Security chairman Mike McCaul, ranking member Bennie G Thompson, subcommittee chair Patrick Meehan and subcommittee ranking member Yvette Clarke, clarifies a number of roles and responsibilities of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and it also strengthens key public/private partnerships.
One of the most interesting and potentially helpful elements of the NCCIP bill is in Title II, Section 202. There, the House approved additional language to be inserted into the Support Anti-Terrorism by Fostering Technologies Act of 2002 (the SAFETY Act). The language would add the term ‘qualifying cyber incident’ to the SAFETY Act, thereby making it perfectly clear that cyber attacks unconnected to ‘acts of terrorism’ may trigger — at the discretion of the secretary of homeland security — the liability protections offered by the SAFETY Act…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Pillsbury briefing.
News from Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
US & The Americas: guidance for companies developing and implementing antitrust compliance programmes
Recent policy statements by the DoJ highlight the factors companies should consider when developing and implementing antitrust compliance programmes.
Parties with no operations or other relationship to England or the UK frequently specify English law as controlling, with a clause providing for arbitration of disputes in London.