HMRC clampdown on tax avoidance
Tax avoidance is in the news — think of the string of celebrities whose tax affairs have become public knowledge. It seems certain to become even more of a talking point as HMRC’s crackdown on anti-avoidance schemes is set to intensify over the summer months.
A new measure, which will come into effect when the Finance Bill 2014 receives royal assent in July, will enable HMRC to oblige taxpayers to pay disputed tax upfront where the tax is associated with schemes covered by the Disclosure of Tax Avoidance Schemes (DOTAS) Rules, introduced in 2004, or under the General Anti-Abuse Rule (GAAR).
Reports suggest that HMRC is intending to issue between 35,000 and 45,000 notices to individuals and companies (primarily individuals) to pay tax that HMRC believes is owing from such schemes. HMRC estimates that it may raise as much as £7bn from these notices…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
Landlords must protect tenants’ deposits and provide tenants with prescribed information, regardless of when the tenancy commenced and when the deposit was received.
In the Yam Seng case, the court was willing to imply a duty of good faith to give business efficacy to a commercial contract. Since that case, the law has been somewhat uncertain.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.