High Court refuses to allow constitution of limitation fund by letter of undertaking
Ince recently represented cargo interests in English High Court proceedings in which ship owners sought to constitute a tonnage limitation fund under the 1976 Convention and 1996 Protocol to limit their potential liability towards various interests following the sinking of the vessel together with the claimants’ cargoes. One issue the court had to consider was whether the owners are entitled to set up a limitation fund by way of a guarantee in the form of a letter of undertaking (LOU) issued by a reputable P&I Club, instead of the usual payment into court.
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Ince & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Ince & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ince & Co
The Supreme Court has recently ruled that the buyers under a sale contract on GAFTA 49 terms could only recover nominal damages for the sellers’ wrongful cancellation of the contract.
Claimants with contractual claims against a Korean ship operator can go through London courts.