High Court considers new bonus in Part 36 regime
By David Nessim
The recent case Feltham v Bouskell  EWHC 3086 (Ch) is one of the first to consider the additional sanction under CPR 36.14(3)(d), introduced on 1 April 2013 as part of the Jackson Reforms.
Feltham v Bouskell concerned the professional negligence of a solicitor in failing to prepare a will for the relative of the claimant. Just prior to the commencement of trial, the claimant made a Part 36 offer that was not accepted by the defendant.
The court found in favour of the claimant. However, the judgment awarded was only slightly more advantageous to the claimant than the Part 36 offer rejected by the defendant…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
The case of Hershaw and ors v Sheffield City Council is a reminder to employers to be careful about how and what they communicate to their employees.
Employers have a duty to prevent illegal working and are obliged to carry out prescribed document checks on individuals before they commence work.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…