High Court concludes that methods of medical treatment are patentable
On 4 December 2013, the High Court judgment in Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd & ors  HCA 50 was delivered. This is the first occasion that the High Court has considered whether methods of medical treatment of the human body are patentable inventions within the meaning of section 18(1) of the Patents Act 1990 (cth). The majority of the High Court concluded they were, while providing important guidance on contributory (or indirect) infringement in the context of patents which claim methods of medical treatment.
By way of background, the patent in issue was Australian Patent No 670491, entitled ’Pharmaceutical for the treatment of skin disorders’. Relevantly, the patent claims: ‘[a] method of preventing or treating a skin disorder wherein the skin disorder is psoriasis, which comprises administering to a recipient an effective amount of [leflunomide].’ Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd (Sanofi) markets leflunomide in Australia under the brand name ARAVA.
In 2008, Apotex Pty Ltd (Apotex) obtained registrations for a generic leflunomide product. Shortly thereafter, Sanofi commenced infringement proceedings largely relying on section 117 of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) which relates to contributory (or indirect) infringement…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
DLA Piper has released the winter 2014 issue of SHE Matters, a newsletter dedicated to safety, health and the environment.
This regular publication by DLA Piper lawyers focuses on helping clients navigate the ever-changing business, legal and regulatory landscape.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The fragile refinance market is back in rude health and US-style alternative lenders are stepping up with innovative structures to sustain the recovery
The Lawyer’s latest Top 50 litigation firms list shows that business for dispute specialists is roaring along while new in-depth detail reveals the winning strategies