Have companies lost the ability to sue for defamation?
By Tim Sales
The Defamation Act 2013 and the Defamation (Operators of Websites) Regulations 2013 came into force on 1 January 2014. Companies in particular will now face considerable challenges in attempting to bring a successful defamation claim. Other significant changes shift more power to defendants, attempting to move the jurisdiction of England and Wales away from its claimant-friendly reputation and provide increased protection for website operators.
Many of these changes will be welcomed, particularly by website operators, secondary publishers and other frequent defendants. However, companies may need to start exploring other avenues in an effort to preserve their reputations if defamed. While companies are familiar with awards of only nominal damages in successful defamation claims, now, in the absence of demonstrable ‘serious financial harm’, a statement that injures the reputation of a company may not be defamatory at all.
This article explains the key changes and what they might mean for parties involved in or considering launching defamation claims…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Nabarro briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Nabarro
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Nabarro
Choosing the right adjudicator to decide your dispute can be one of the most important and difficult aspects of the adjudication process.
In this case, the court considered a payment of funds into court as an alternative remedy to specific performance to deliver security documentation.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Nabarro senior partner and self-confessed “IT geek” Graham Stedman is heralding a major set of investments in technology ahead of the firm’s move to 125 London Wall this year.
Clients are more willing to bring claims against professional service providers but the risk to defendants is not as dramatic as it might seem