Growing trend for protecting images used without consent

By Joelle Rich

With the continuous rise of social media and Twitter or Instagram endorsements appearing on celebrity social media feeds, it’s certainly a growing theme that companies will pay substantial fees for someone high-profile to endorse their goods. Advertising regulations require companies to make it clear to consumers when something is a commercial endorsement, and so celebrities will often use ‘#advert’ or ‘#SPON’ to do so.

With the rise of celebrity endorsements, like any counterfeit strategy there comes the rise of celebrity false endorsements. There are at least two battles currently under way by Hollywood actresses who are trying to prevent others from using their image to advertise products without their consent under the doctrine of ‘false endorsement’. We saw this issue last year when Rihanna successfully sued Topshop after it used her image on its T-shirts, although this is due to be appealed.

More recently, Scarlett Johansson has launched a case in the French courts for false endorsement against an author whose novel features a character that she says closely resembles her. The claim is that the author and publisher of the book have used her image and reputation to publicise the book, which has already sold 100,000 copies since it was published in March 2013. Ms Johansson is seeking damages and an injunction to prevent translation and adaptation for cinema. The author has previously argued that using Ms Johansson’s name allowed him to make a statement about the way modern romantic fantasies were affected by the ‘pervasiveness of celebrity culture’, albeit that his heroine was not meant to actually be Ms Johansson. A decision from the French court is due in July…

Click on the link below to read the rest of the Schillings briefing.

Briefings from Schillings

  • The great dilemma — apps vs data privacy

    Individuals and businesses need to begin assessing the risk of their data being misused, not by the person they’re sending images to but by hackers who may attempt to steal their data.

  • Data breaches are personal

    The recent hacking of celebrity images and those belonging to Snapchat users show that individuals are not immune to targeted cyber attacks. 

View more briefings from Schillings

Analysis from The Lawyer


41 Bedford Square