Group personal pension arrangements: not as hands-off as they seem?
By Georgina Wardrop
Businesses have become used to seeing group personal pension arrangements (GPPs) as the simple option for their employees, with the employer’s involvement in practice often being limited to the initial selection of a provider. The decision is frequently made on grounds of administrative ease.
This is in contrast with occupational pension schemes, where a body of trustees has an ongoing fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the beneficiaries. Employers must liaise with the trustees on various matters and either company personnel must be spared from their usual work when carrying out trustee duties or a professional trustee must be paid to take on the role.
The level of involvement required by businesses in GPPs is likely to increase in the future, as the government is turning its attention to the quality of defined-contribution pension schemes offered by employers, including GPPs…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
Why register to The Lawyer
More relevant to you
News from Taylor Wessing
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Taylor Wessing
For the tax year from 6 April 2014, the standard lifetime allowance has reduced from £1.5m to £1.25m.
One of the areas highlighted last year by the Regulator was the regulation of workplace DC pension schemes.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As the equity capital markets rocketed back into favour and global M&A saw at least a partial return to form, there have been some rich pickings for The Lawyer’s Corporate Team of the Year award shortlisted firms in 2014.
The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world