Group personal pension arrangements: not as hands-off as they seem?
By Georgina Wardrop
Businesses have become used to seeing group personal pension arrangements (GPPs) as the simple option for their employees, with the employer’s involvement in practice often being limited to the initial selection of a provider. The decision is frequently made on grounds of administrative ease.
This is in contrast with occupational pension schemes, where a body of trustees has an ongoing fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the beneficiaries. Employers must liaise with the trustees on various matters and either company personnel must be spared from their usual work when carrying out trustee duties or a professional trustee must be paid to take on the role.
The level of involvement required by businesses in GPPs is likely to increase in the future, as the government is turning its attention to the quality of defined-contribution pension schemes offered by employers, including GPPs…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Taylor Wessing
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Taylor Wessing
Following the release of the Autumn Statement, Taylor Wessing has summarised some of the main announcements.
The European Commission has launched a public consultation in support of its review of the EU copyright regime.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world
Financial disputes are starting to dominate the English courts as the long-awaited fallout from the downturn finally comes to town