Gross misconduct dismissals — Eastlands Homes Partnership Limited v Cunningham
In the recent case of Eastlands Homes Partnership Limited v Cunningham UKEAT/0272/13, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) confirmed the correct approach to determine whether a claimant has been unfairly dismissed for gross misconduct.
Mr Cunningham was employed by the appellant as a caretaker of a care home for the elderly. One of the tenants of the care home left his entire estate to Mr Cunningham and his wife. The appellant’s code of conduct prohibited employees from accepting gifts exceeding £50, and also stated that any gifts or benefits must be approved by the management of the care home. However, when the Cunninghams inherited the tenant’s entire estate, Mr Cunningham failed to declare his inheritance to the appellant until a disciplinary investigation was initiated three months later.
Following the disciplinary investigation, Mr Cunningham was summarily dismissed for gross misconduct (the most serious type of misconduct) on the basis that he had seriously breached the trust of the appellant by failing to disclose the fact that he was a beneficiary under a tenant’s will…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Winckworth Sherwood briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Winckworth Sherwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Winckworth Sherwood
The EAT considered whether an employee who said she was too ill to resign for 18 months and who received 39 weeks’ sick pay during that period had affirmed her contract.
It is possible for employers to defend unfair dismissal claims arising from inappropriate use of social media even if the misconduct is not work-related.