Green and Rowley: Court of Appeal judgment handed down

The keenly awaited Court of Appeal judgment in the mis-selling interest swap case brought by Paul Rowley and John Green against RBS has just been released. Taylor Wessing reported in an earlier e-alert that the Court of Appeal held that the bank owed Green and Rowley no common law duty of care on which to base a claim for damages. The written judgment, setting out their Lordships’ reasoning, confirms that where, as here, a bank does not assume an advisory relationship with its customer, but simply provides it with information as to the suitability of the swap in question, it will not be required to demonstrate compliance with its statutory obligations in order to avoid a mirror claim at common law.

By way of recap, Messrs Green and Rowley brought proceedings claiming that they were mis-sold an interest-rate swap as the bank had failed to inform them of potential break costs related to the swap. A claim for breach of statutory duty of the then relevant Conduct of Business Rules (COB Rules) was time barred, so they sought to argue that a duty, imposing the same requirements as under the statutory regime, also existed at common law to take advantage of the ‘more generous’ limitation period available under the common law. They asserted that the relevant duty included those under COB Rule 2.1.3 to take reasonable steps to communicate fairly or clearly and Rule 5.4.3 to take reasonable steps to ensure that the customer understands the nature of the risks involved. The Court of Appeal disagreed, making it clear that the ‘mere existence’ of a statutory duty, such as the requirement to comply with the COB Rules as in this case, does not give rise to a co-extensive duty of care, which effectively imposes the same requirements as the statutory duty, at common law…

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.

Sign in or Register to continue reading this article

Sign in


It's quick, easy and free!

It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.

Register now

Why register to The Lawyer


Industry insight

In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.


Market intelligence

Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.


Email newsletters

Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.

More relevant to you

To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.

Briefings from Taylor Wessing

View more briefings from Taylor Wessing

Analysis from The Lawyer

  • merger deal

    Corporate crunch time: who will triumph at The Lawyer Awards 2014?

    As the equity capital markets rocketed back into favour and global M&A saw at least a partial return to form, there have been some rich pickings for The Lawyer’s Corporate Team of the Year award shortlisted firms in 2014. 

  • singapore orchid

    Singapore: Cash course

    The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world

View more analysis from The Lawyer


5 New Street Square

Turnover (£m): 241.20
No. of lawyers: 860 (UK 200)
Jurisdiction: UK
No. of offices: 6
No. of qualified lawyers: 73 (International 50)
No. of partners: 29