Great Elephant v Trafigura Beheer BV and Others — force majeure, foreseeability and FOB Incoterms
Ince & Co recently represented Vitol Asia and Vitol SA before the Court of Appeal in the matter of the Crudesky. The case arose out of the loading of a cargo of crude oil in late August/early September 2009 at the Akpo FPSO Terminal off the coast of Nigeria, which is operated by Total. The key facts, as summarised by the Court of Appeal, were as follows.
China Offshore Oil (COOSI) sold and Vitol Asia bought a parcel of one million barrels of Akpo Condensate for delivery FOB at the terminal. Shortly thereafter, Vitol Asia sold the same quantity on the same terms to Vitol SA, who in turn on-sold the cargo to Trafigura, also on FOB terms.
Trafigura nominated the Crudesky (the vessel), which it had already chartered from Great Elephant Corporation as disponent owners, on an amended BP Voy 3 form…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Ince & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ince & Co
Surprise: claims for unpaid bunkers under bunker supply contracts are straightforward claims in debt where the passing of property is not required
Also: be specific in tripartite agreements; the right to rely on refund guarantees; and more.