Great Elephant v Trafigura Beheer BV and Others — force majeure, foreseeability and FOB Incoterms
Ince & Co recently represented Vitol Asia and Vitol SA before the Court of Appeal in the matter of the Crudesky. The case arose out of the loading of a cargo of crude oil in late August/early September 2009 at the Akpo FPSO Terminal off the coast of Nigeria, which is operated by Total. The key facts, as summarised by the Court of Appeal, were as follows.
China Offshore Oil (COOSI) sold and Vitol Asia bought a parcel of one million barrels of Akpo Condensate for delivery FOB at the terminal. Shortly thereafter, Vitol Asia sold the same quantity on the same terms to Vitol SA, who in turn on-sold the cargo to Trafigura, also on FOB terms.
Trafigura nominated the Crudesky (the vessel), which it had already chartered from Great Elephant Corporation as disponent owners, on an amended BP Voy 3 form…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Ince & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Ince & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ince & Co
The Court of Appeal has ruled in underwriters’ favour regarding the use of a fraudulent device by an assured in connection with the presentation of an insurance claim.
The English courts can have a critical role to play in support of foreign proceedings. The ability to obtain interim relief is an important strategic tool, which can be decisive.